I saw right through this biotch

Watch Debrahlee's Breast Enhancement Surgery - Long Island Plastic Surgical Group in People & Blogs View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com

Video has emerged of fired and allegedly sexually harassed banker Debrahlee Lorenzana discussing and undergoing plastic surgery. This video from the Long Island Plastic Surgical Group depicts Lorenzana's journey through her second set of breast implants, complete with graphic footage from the operating room. Highlights from the video are between the 2-3:30 minute mark where Lorenzana claims that she wants the body of a Playboy Playmate, thinks plastic surgery is the best thing ever, and wants to look like "tits on a stick". Throughout the whole video Lorenzana presents herself as a sexual being, admits wanting to look sexy to find and keep a rich husband, and shows a complete disregard for personal health or having a proportional, normal looking body.

Did I see right through this tramp or what? Debrahlee Lorenzana is clearly a woman who willingly puts her sexuality on display and wants attention. Who the hell makes such asinine comments on camera AND allows their private body parts during plastic surgery to be filmed? Even Dr. 90210 blurs out the nips! Not to mention the money she's irresponsibly been pissing away on 3 cosmetic surgeries. My little sympathy for this woman is definitely gonzo.

Hot for banker

A news story is making all the girly blogs upset today because a very attractive female business banker was fired from a job at Citibank, allegedly because her looks, clothing and sexuality were distracting in the workplace. The woman in question, Debrahlee Lorenzana, is obviously suing. If everything said and documented is to be true (which I always give people the benefit of the doubt until I see inconsistencies), then Lorenzana obviously has a case and was wrongly treated.

The choices she is making now, however, are ruining my impression of her. In a photo shoot for The Village Voice, Lorenzana is dressed in her "business attire" including an extremely low-cut beige satin blouse and a white skin-tight bandagelike dress. Her posing is more Maxim than Fortune, and her facial expressions are way too "come hither" to be seen as professional. These are in sharp contrast to photos directed by her lawyer (also pictured in the Voice article) where she looks professional, polished, and attractive in a black pantsuit. It seems that now that major press is involved, Lorenzana may be capitalizing in the wrong way. She is also all too quick to elaborate on her Latin heritage, poverty-stricken upbringing, and financial troubles after the firing. Lorenzana then makes the mistake of noting her 5 closets full of Hermes and Louis Vuitton outfits. If you're going for the sympathy card, don't mention the LVs.

Something about the article also bothers me in terms of consistency. In the second paragraph of the article it claims that her bosses cited work performance as the reason for termination, but on the third page it reads that her female manager at a new branch mentioned clothing complaints and not work performance during the firing. This may be a journalistic error, but clouds my judgment of the case none the less.

It all seems a little exaggerated and put-on for me. I just know I've never done my banking with so many "extras" on display as are being depicted in Lorenzana's pictures...

"Idol" scandals already...shocker

The American Idol top 24 was announced this week and frankly my dear, I barely give a damn. I've fallen asleep during many of my attempts to watch this season's episodes, even during my beloved Hollywood week, because so far this season has suuuuuucked! (and admittedly I've usually been drunk)

A few weeks ago there was a rumor that Michael Lynch had been DQed (disqualified, not Dairy Queen-ed) because his father prematurely revealed his top 24 success to a local newspaper. Well, it's looking more and more like that was just a rumor because Michael is slated to compete in Wednesday's first male semi-final round. And I'm cool with that because I like this dude.

Then this week the REAL scandal broke involving Chris Golightly. Allegedly, homeboy had been under contract with a boyband and neglected to disclose that information to the producers. The contract ended a month before Golightly's Idol audition so technically he would have been eligible. However, he brushed over the truth about this in his initial paperwork, and apparently his manager effed up and couldn't find the proof that Golightly was a free man, so he was bumped from the competition in the final hour and replaced by Tim Urban. Cue some very creative editing during the top 24 announcement episode. But I'm also fairly cool with this because Tim is quite the hottie in a cougar cub/Zefron kind of way.

First of all, Golightly clearly has his priorities messed up if he was willing to walk away from a perfectly good boyband for American Idol. Secondly, I'm of the mindset that if you have a manager you probably shouldn't be auditioning anyway. I'm all about my Idol being an every-man type. Third of all, with all the shadiness and "lost paperwork" perhaps the Idol producers had to fudge all this to cover the fact the Golightly (btw best name EVER) was actually in-eligible due to Justin Guarini's 10 year racially-ambiguous-white-boy-with-a-fro monopoly. Because Guarini is a diva and can't take the competition.

FOURTH OF ALL, Idol is pissing me off for cutting arguably their best competitor, Thaddeus Johnson. This kid can sing better than most of the people they've had on the show in the past three years, yet somehow he was deemed unworthy of making the semi-finals. Really?!? Maybe they just knew that he would give a fantastic crying/screaming/cursing/locking himself in a bathroom stall fit upon receiving the bad news. And I'm really supposed to believe that it's still about the music?

This has gone too far

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

I love pageants, and I was watching on Sunday night when this went down. I knew at the time it was an "oh-snap" moment, but I am surprised that we as a country are taking it this far. I'm surprised at you, Perez Hilton. I don't usually like to get too political on this blog, and let's just say that my answer to the question would not have been the same as Miss California's, but after watching the above video I feel the need to share my thoughts about how this is being handled.

In regard to the answer itself, since when do we as Americans who are granted FREEDOM OF SPEECH have the right to tell someone that her opinion is wrong? Miss California had the right to express the views she did, but it was some of her justification that I had a problem with. She uses the word "choose" several times, notably "we live in a land that you can choose same sex marriage or opposite marriage." "Opposite" marriage flub aside, Miss California, we are not able to choose what type of marriage we want. First, only a small number of states allow same-sex marriage. Not many choices there. Secondly, if she was implying that you can choose whether you're attracted to the same or opposite sex, THAT I have a problem with. I have no problem with the latter part of her answer that most of the media is harping on where she states that she believes marriage should be between a man and a woman. She has the right to believe whatever she wants.

I expected this to get media attention, but with the numerous post-incident interviews and apologies and revoking of apologies, I am sick of this and disappointed that we can't just let bygones be bygones. Carrie Prejean, Miss California, is not our new Miss USA. Her views do not officially of unofficially represent that of our country and thus they do not effect you. Go to Alabama where people are expressing these same views, only without the spray tan, eloquence, and general respect for all people. Throw in the word "faggot" that still comes out of many people's mouths in 2009 and would still come out even with a camera in front of them, and then try to tell me that Miss California is a "bitch" and a "cunt". Perez, I am disappointed that you are treating this young woman in this manner. In your mind, there was only one right answer to your pageant question and since it wasn't given, anything else became offensive and scandal worthy. Very closed minded in my opinion. How dare we actually have a healthy debate of ideas? If we were all the same, life would be boring, and we wouldn't have "scandals" like this for people like Perez Hilton to get their panties in a bunch about.

So Carrie P, I'll have your back any day girlfriend.